I’ve been asked to write on a subject that I thought about quite a bit, and that is – exactly how will the elites gain more power and get away with it?

Well, historically, during times of peace (however short/rare those were), people were relatively happy with the level of power that the elites had, if they didn’t outright think they had too much, and weren’t willing to surrender any freedom on the altar of elite power. It’s hard to convince people to further increase the state monopoly on violence when there doesn’t seem to be any extreme reason to be violent, and peaceful times produce liberty as a result of this.

Additionally, during non-peaceful times, the state can expand dramatically to respond to the threat, which means that some of the biggest, most sweeping technological advancements in history have happened under wartime conditions, or conditions that were similar enough to wartime that the elites could justify extending their reach. This is part of why every major historical age has been marked by changes in weapons technology.

Humans are a species in constant conflict, and whether or not that conflict is necessary is the subject of heated debate in many circles. Anarchists like ourselves generally tend to claim that it isn’t, and that we can survive in relative peace, or at least non-aggression, but we are heterodox thinkers. The idea of cooperation superseding conflict is a relatively new one, at least in terms of global acceptance. There have been pockets of anarchist thought around the world, and pockets of more libertarian societies that have cropped up all throughout history, usually marked by relative peace and prosperity.

But that kind of thing does not sit well with the elites, whose pretended importance and necessity had been chipped at by such acts of non-violence and cooperation. The elites need a constant, evolving, and never ending supply of reasons to continue their brutal reign. The problem is, people don’t always want to acquiesce to elite plans or their schedules, and with the massively interconnected state capitalist paradigm under which we live, their power depends on this constant expansion, and stagnation means death.

So let’s say you’re an elite, and you want to secure more power, but no organic wartime conditions are surfacing. The whole economy is unstable and based on debt, so how do you make people forget that fact, and continue to spend and participate in this economy, and follow the laws of their given country?

Ordo ab chao.

This environment is too stable, and you must do something to destabilize it so that you can exploit the instability to increase your power. But you don’t want to destabilize it too much, because then they’ll stop participating in your economy, reducing your profit and ability to expand your power. Therefore, you need to destabilize it in a way that can increase your power. This can be done in the same exact ways as conventional warfare, through both soft and hard power, convincing the people by overt and covert means of violence, corruption, and destruction, that something must be done to stop the madness, so that you can come in and deal with it in a way that both profits you and expands your power, the profit being necessary to continue power expansion, both by building new tools and resources, and acquiring more territory.

Few people explain this model better than David Icke:

“The reason we are so controlled is not that we don’t have the power to decide our own destiny, it is that we give that power away every minute of our lives. When something happens that we don’t like, we look for someone else to blame. When there is a problem in the world, we say ‘What are they going to do about it’. At which point they, who have secretly created the problem in the first place, respond to this demand by introducing a ‘solution’ – more centralisation of power and erosion of freedom. If you want to give more powers to the police, security agencies and military, and you want the public to demand you do it, then ensure there is more crime, violence and terrorism, and then it’s a cinch to achieve your aims. Once the people are in fear of being burgled, mugged or bombed, they will demand that you take their freedom away to protect them from what they have been manipulated to fear. The Oklahoma bombing is a classic of this kind, as I detail in ..And The Truth Shall Set You Free. I call this technique problem-reaction-solution. Create the problem, encourage the reaction “something must be done”, and then offer the solution. It is summed up by the Freemason motto ‘Ordo Ab Chao’ -order out of chaos. Create the chaos and then offer the way to restore order. Your order. The masses are herded and directed by many and various forms of emotional and mental control. It is the only way it could be done.”

If all that seems too complicated, I can say that it boils down to a term most people have heard, but few people understand, and one which has been tainted by some of the people who have employed it, thus rendering it less useful in discussions.

A “false flag” attack is one where a party executes an attack of one sort or another and then blames another party for it. It comes from naval warfare, where ships were identified by the flags they flew, and where people flying a flag which did not belong to them could make it seem like a different party was responsible for an attack, alluding, or some other such act of aggression. Now, the term has expanded to the point where it can also be applied to soft power, and not just hard power attacks. Not only do the elites employ physical means to secure their power, but they also employ a variety of economic, infrastructural, and cyberattacks.

However, for some readers of this article, they won’t believe that this kind of thing happens at all, much less that it might happen again. They hear the term “inside job” and they automatically seize up, as though struck. It’s laughable and naive, but given the fact that the indoctrination system that this society mistakenly calls education has driven independent thought into the ground, and heavily discouraged people from doing their own research, the overwhelmingly statist narrative that constantly comes from that system should be no surprise. And the idea that every single time there has been a conflict, western powers were justified in getting involved and expanding the state in order to address it, is at the root of very many people’s patriotism, and striking at that root might cause some sort of dissent. We can’t have that.

Well…I can. But I’m an evil anarchist.

To get people started on this journey into conspiracy land, a good place to begin is officially released US government documents referring to a proposed operation called Operation Northwoods. In a document titled “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba ,” the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States government proposed a series of attacks wherein Cuban refugees would be killed, planes would be made to look as though they were shot down, ships would be exploded, and terrorism would be done in the US, by the US government, only to be blamed on Cuba, all the way back in 1962,. You see, the problem was, Cuba was getting too friendly with the Soviet Union, and the Cold War meant that anybody who wasn’t mortal enemies of Russia was considered just as bad as Russia themselves.

I don’t know if that sounds familiar to anything that’s been happening these days, but it would be pretty funny if modern politicians were still using Russia as an excuse to expand their power.

Oh wait.

Anyway, the operation’s desired effect would have been as follows:

“The desired result from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

If you’re one of the kind of people who needed confirmation that this sort of thing happened, I can already hear you asking why I’m bringing it up if the proposal was rejected. Well, this is just the one that got rejected. That doesn’t mean that other operations weren’t approved, and it certainly doesn’t mean that there aren’t off the books operations which never got publicized as widely as this one did. The fact is, these were declassified records, and there are more classified records. What those records contain is anyone’s guess, but there are likely more comparable things like it.

For instance, Operation Cyclone.

The Carter administration, alongside Zbigniew Brzeziński, through the work of the CIA, covertly armed, funded, and trained the mujahideen in Afghanistan and other places to create what is now the terror threat – which to this day justifies the War on Terror. This was not rejected, and they very much did undergo this plan. Brzezinski said of the Pakistani rebels, and I’m not exaggerating or fabricating, “We know of their deep belief in god, and we are confident that their struggle will succeed – that land over there is yours, and you’ll go back to it one day because your fight will prevail and you’ll have your homes and your mosques back again because your cause is right and god is on your side.”

This operation lasted a decade. Yes, it did eventually result in a Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. But given that the US is at war in Afghanistan to this day, it’s not like they got their land back. And it’s not as though there’s any more peace there. Just more US government expansion, due to flames that they stoked, and conflict that they created. Can’t light up opium without heat, after all. Hell, they even funded a camp in Khost for a guy named Tim Osman, a CIA asset who would eventually be named Osama Bin Laden, so the US government could justify using him as a scapegoat for Islamist violence, and using tracking his whereabouts as a pretext for the significant amount of US interventionism and war overseas.

Still not enough for you?

How about the fact that the US put a bunch of passengers aboard the Lusitania, along with a bunch of munitions and explosives, and sent it through hostile waters so that it would intentionally be destroyed, thus allowing the US to stoke interest in World War One, justifying entering it when they had previously been neutral. How about the fact that the US had to create an entire committee to produce fake news to make the enemy look worse than they were so the American people would continue to stay interested in the war effort? How about the fact that the US had every opportunity to use the information garnered from decoding efforts of secret communications to prevent Pearl Harbor from happening, but intentionally chose not to, and gave anyone the shaft who was considering helping, so that they could justify entering World War 2 when they had previously been neutral.

What about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, where the US government lied about an unprovoked attack in order to secure the bloody and brutal war in Vietnam, which would eventually result in US withdrawal. Or when the testimony of Nayirah al-Ṣabaḥ, where she claimed babies were removed from incubators by Iraqi troops and left to die, was used to stir favor for US involvement in the Gulf War. Or when Colin Powell dangled a little bit of powder in front of a bunch of people in order to claim that there was evidence of weapons of mass destruction for yet more invasions in the Middle East. Or a chemical attack that was faked in Syria in order to spur more troops over there.

Are you noticing a theme here? And don’t even get me started on 911. Instead, watch James Corbett’s video on it, and ask yourself about the US government’s track record. If you’re honest with yourself, and don’t reject all the history I just mentioned in favor of a more comfortable narrative of defending the “Homeland™”, I think you’ll find that the idea of trusting the US government is more farfetched than the principle of doubt.

And it’s not just the US government which does this. Let’s not forget that in order to seize significant amount of power, there had to be a reason in Germany as well. So the Nazis had to burn down the Reichstag and blame communists in order to justify expansion of the right wing power that they’d been amassing for a significant period of time. It wasn’t enough, obviously, because as soon as they had seized a significant amount of power they also murdered their entire left wing in the Night of the Long Knives (you should look that up if you don’t know what it is, especially if you’re one of the people who spreads around the idea that Nazis were somehow leftist), but the idea of the necessity of purging communism, liberalism, and leftism in general from Germany needed to be planted in the minds of the people. In order to do that, they had to create a boogeyman, and do that they did.

Funny how communism is constantly the boogeyman for nations which the US is at least partially aligned with. All the US companies that did business with Hitler, as well as all of the US political interests in Germany at the time created a ripe environment for this sort of corruption, and it’s no surprise that the US would go on to use similar excuses to justify a huge amount of interventionism as a part of the Cold War, with the ever present communist boogeyman as an excuse. More examples exist elsewhere as well, but I don’t have time or characters in this piece for that, so stay tuned maybe.

The question is, then, if it happens again, what form will it take?

Well, there are so many more points of critical infrastructural damage than there were before, and so many potentially new vectors. A couple of possibilities already exist however.

Not the least among them is the distinct possibility that the current pandemic was caused by gain of function testing at a BSL 4 level lab, and allowed out of the lab so that governments around the world could have an excuse to increase their power dramatically. Ever since this pandemic kicked off, governments have been using it as an excuse to implement facial recognition everywhere (which was growing increasingly unpopular prior to this), reset their financial structure, update their digital infrastructure, increase police presences, and test their many methods of keeping everybody locked down in whatever areas they designate. They’ve gotten huge amounts of funding, huge amounts more authority, and a population of self-policing Karen cunts who do the opposite of “minding their own business”.

The entire world has turned into a panopticon police state where the inmates are all snitches, and where prison breaks are seen as immoral, and all they needed to do was blame bats and the Chinese, which has caused the same kind of racism which pervaded wartime mentality forever. People are now very nationalist and very against China, and insular as well, encouraging closed borders in lockdown restrictions, even though those don’t really help prevent viral spread. Ron Paul was right, the border wall is being used to keep us in. And the pandemic is being used as an excuse to use it. I see no reason to believe that this “war” on this pandemic is any different to any other false flag “war” kind of thing that has happened in history. It has all the trappings and all the benefits of a false flag to the governments involved.

And it has the potential to never stop, with new excuses coming out in the form of new strains constantly. I don’t know this to be certain, and I’m definitely not saying the virus isn’t real. I’m not one of those people. But what I am saying is that the way it’s being handled is severely indicative of multiple industrial complexes having set this up in an attempt to get more control for profit. And given the fact that the pandemic has been simulated already, and they already had the solution prepacked in the form of ID 2020, it seems like it fits the problem reaction solution model relatively tightly.

And given the fact that the US government itself is already done a ton of lethal medical experiments on the American people, and given the fact that one of those involved spraying a bunch of contaminants into a cloud just so that it rained biological death on San Francisco (Operation Sea Spray), don’t be surprised if something similar to that happened in order to initiate this entire thing.

So, if not that, what? Well, a critical point of failure lately has been infrastructure, namely, electrical power. The Vatican was without power for a significant amount of time, and so was Pakistan. Many theories are circulating that the outages are an excuse to test the response to set outages and potentially an excuse to install new infrastructure while lines aren’t active and while people are struggling to get by, and don’t have the time, money, or energy, to investigate said infrastructure being installed, and probably wouldn’t anyway because they would assume it had something to do with restoring power, so they would thank officials for it no matter what it was.

Power infrastructures are often considered a key point of failure by people who study the potential “shit hits the fan” scenarios, and while it might not be the end of the world at that particular moment, it could very well be a false flag. It wouldn’t be that hard to set up a power outage, and the government already does it all the time. The fact is, they could turn it off whenever they want it and blame some sort of failure, or blame a foreign entity, or possibly some sort of domestic terrorist threat. It’s very possible, very doable, and cheap as hell, so I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s exactly what happens.

If they wanted to take it the extra mile, they would even stage an attack on some vital infrastructure center in terms of the power – a lot of them are so wildly unprotected and extremely vulnerable that it wouldn’t be difficult to disable one of them. Many people have been making videos on how easy it would be to take down an entire section of power grid simply by taking out one of these power stations or substations. It wouldn’t be hard to do that and blame it on somebody else. And take this same methodology and apply it to communications, and you get a whole new ball of wax, but with the same essential trappings. That explosion in Nashville for instance could definitely have been planned. It was right next to AT&T, so an attack on infrastructure would make some measure of sense. Test how people respond to a lack of communication, so that when you clean up the beta, you can roll out the first build at the software with no kinks.

Similarly, it wouldn’t be difficult to do the same thing to an element of cyber security, that is if it hasn’t happened already. Whether or not you believe the election was rigged to get Trump in office to begin with or whether you believe it was rigged to get him out, a decent amount of people blame Russia for either with no proof needed; a false flag is being perpetuated by peoples assumptions rather than an actual attack. Every Russiagate theory has been succinctly debunked, but for some reason they persist, and the jingoism and xenophobia which have been running back against the Russians for decades does not help their case in terms of getting the benefit of the doubt. They’ve already been the boogeyman for as long as boogiemen have been boogiemen, so they might as well keep it going. Same with any kind of communism, and anything remotely leftist. People have been afraid of the influence of Russia on our digital infrastructure for so long and they’re only one of the many foreign powers who could potentially be accused of something similar to this.

For years, a minority of people have talked about vulnerabilities baked into technology that was made in China, including compromised chips, bad codes, and more. The fact is, this kind of racism is exactly why Trump got so much support for the potential of shutting down TikTok – more people are afraid of a Chinese attack on our digital infrastructure, and they’re willing to look at a video sharing app pretty readily, rather than all the technology that gets imported to the US still, while it doesn’t make any promises to stop using Muslim slave labor, or factories with suicide Nets and other anti-suicide measures to prevent workers who have had enough for and ending it right then and there.

But given the fact that the last publicly discussed Bilderberg meeting was directly related to cyber security and infrastructure, it seems to me that it wouldn’t be too hard for them to enact this particular type of false flag, since it’s already baked into the psyches of the American people, and the agendas of the middle and lower elements of the state, so there would be no work necessary to propagandize it; all the propaganda has already been put out there. Additionally, the state has been trying to increase their reach into the privacy of given devices for a very long time, and any excuse that they could use to increase their power, they probably will. Like I said before, however, when things are too peaceful for them to seek that power more naturally, they can create circumstances where that power will be given to them by the common person, and happily. And that’s what such a false flag would probably do. With everybody so wedded to their technology and incapable of going a day without logging into social media or one of their content platforms, they would scream for whatever brought their previous way of life back. Even if it was only sedentary, and pretty much a prison to begin with, period.

But if none of that happens, they could always go for what they’ve always gone for which is just a good old fashioned war. One of the last countries without a Rothschild-operated central bank is Iran, and they have recently had a general assassinated by the US government, a president, unilaterally, and with no congressional oversight over the decision. Now that president has an active notice out for his arrest along with 47 other people issued by Iran through Interpol. A few weeks ago while everybody was talking about the capitol, Iran was issuing those notices, and holding a ship hostage owned by South Korea, allegedly for unpaid debts. Ever since Biden got into office, there have been nothing but talks about Iran’s fissile material that they might be building up. This asinine and atrocious ploy for yet more conflict in interventionism has been pretty well received come all things considered. Very few people have been opposed to the concept of additional intervention in the Middle East, and the only places Biden has changed at all are moving troops, and not all of them come out of Yemen. But he didn’t remove them from circulation. And he didn’t let them come home. So I’m to assume very little but the fact that he probably is re-stationing them for the potential for some huge military action, and with all the anti-Iran sentiment lately, it wouldn’t surprise me if it had something to do with that, so keep your eyes on the news for attacks related to Iran, because it would not be hard to make Iran seem like the villain in this story.

If they succeeded in making Iran look like the villain in this story, they would have a new theater for their “totally-not-a-war” War on Terror, and they could keep perpetuating it for another period of time. They’ve been needing a new source of revenue in power for awhile, and this would be just too perfect if it is accidental. I kind of doubt it is. I think they’re going to engineer something to get the American people on board with an attack on Iran, so that they’ll be OK with yet more military in the Middle East, and thank president Biden for all the jobs that he’ll give them being in that military. Remember, one of the first things he did was allowed trans people to serve openly in the military. How inclusive that trans people can now proudly and openly serve the military industrial complex. Stunning and brave. Any sort of imperialist atrocity is OK as long as you’re liberal about it. Not like that confirms the idea of friendly fascism at all. Wait, where’d the antiwar left go? Anyway…

There are plenty more potential false flags that they could put in the motion, and I don’t have time or the characters space to list them all right now – be sure to follow me elsewhere in case you want to see more of my unhinged rants – But here’s a speed round. There could always be an attack on a medical supply chain, and during a pandemic, it would certainly be an easy way to rally support around the flag. Same with food and water supply chains and major water sources, which are all vulnerabilities, and have long term shortage issues anyway. People are concerned about these things and rightly so.

There could also always be another mass shooting. Those are incredibly easy to do, and a lot of them just so happened to coincide with some kind of drill. I wonder why that is. But even the ones that don’t are heavily gameable in favor of the system, and general expansion of the state. Any amount of arson could be on the table, any sort of explosion, and more. And any sort of crime either. It would be extremely easy to pit people against each other, especially if they think they’re in the wrong group, as in BLM or antifa or the Proud Boys or the Capitol “Insurrectionists™” (that’s not an insurrection, you phony), or some other group. Everybody’s pointing fingers at everyone else right now, and it’s a ripe environment for false flag attacks. If people would unify, it be a lot harder for them to pull these off.

But another that I have another article in the works for, could be a financial false flag. After all these meme stocks did so well, legislators, financiers, bankers, and media, clamoured for regulation, intervention, bailouts, and more, all because their precious financial system had been damaged. If that’s not a sign that a false flag attack is coming related to the financial system, maybe something to spur the rise of the digital dollar because they could claim it’s more secure or something, I don’t know what would be.

The fact is, vulnerability has been exposed, and that vulnerability has been there this whole time, in plain sight. But that doesn’t mean that they couldn’t create whatever vulnerability they needed to in order to make their false flag happen. Damage to the official stock market building, some official building related to printing and distribution of dollars, something like that. Something where they could blame foreign actors or domestic terrorist for dramatic damage to the financial system and claim that it was directly related to all these terrible people doing social media things that they now want to censor and regulate personally, to prevent any sort of violence from being incited by people making jokes on Reddit.

I mean, this thing is already being called “GamerGate 3.0” by a bunch of hacks who falsely call themselves journalists, so they might as well attribute everything else to their prescribed boogeyman as well. They’ve been calling everything they don’t like terrorism and violence for decades, and it’s risen to a fever pitch, to the point where things like encryption are also being called into question as potential tools of violence, and people who don’t think that they might go after the financial sector too are naive to be generous, so those people would do well to remember that every major catastrophe has been organized by a government for the benefit of the powerful, and it’s always been about ordo ab chao.

But while I’m speaking Latin, I might as well say you should also ask some other questions like “cui bono”, or who benefits? If you want to know who likely orchestrated something, look for the people who have a pre-packaged solution to it, and are fastest to exploit the bodies before they cool. You can always tell who might have had a hand in something by the eagerness with which they choose to solve it, and the fact that so many of these solutions have come out right after the problems is pretty telling to say the least. They used to be more overt about it by going to war immediately or whatever they were planning on doing, but they’ve had to become more covert and more coded, because more people have been awake to their scheme. That doesn’t make them any less likely to engage in these actions though, so guard your Liberty constantly, watch for attackers and exploiters, especially entryists like fascists and pedophiles trying to infiltrate libertarianism, and “never forget” how much violence these people have set up before, and how much violence their guaranteeably willing to set up again.

What has happened before can happen again, and what has happened there can happen here. One of the gravest errors that people can make is the assumption that their government cares enough about them to not exploit the same tactics they used to oppress others on their own citizens. It’s a deadly mistake, and it could cost a lot more than lives, potentially even the future. So stay frosty, and don’t let anybody remove your freedom in the name of protecting you, but maybe more importantly, don’t let them point the finger at somebody else.

If they can get you to follow the wrong trails, deflect blame, and generally make everyone else seem like the problem, they can ride your prejudices and bigotry a long way, no matter which side you’re on. So, treat everyone as an individual and don’t let your mind be hijacked by group think. Hitler wouldn’t have had any power if he had never had a scapegoat to point at and neither would any of the dictators of the past, and you would do well to remember who your real enemy is, and stop letting them threaten your liberty.

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

– Benjamin Franklin